Can episodes stay tied to their material?
The source files are part of the episode identity, not hidden behind a generic prompt. You can see what an episode was built from and return to the evidence.
Upload material, tell the tool what you want to understand, and let it research across the sources before shaping a cited multi-voice discussion. The goal is not a generic summary. It is a useful conversation you can listen to and inspect.
There are plenty of tools that can summarise a document. This prototype asks a different question: can a set of sources become a conversation that is easier to absorb, still grounded in evidence, and useful enough to listen to away from a screen?
The source files are part of the episode identity, not hidden behind a generic prompt. You can see what an episode was built from and return to the evidence.
Different speaker roles can extend, question and pressure-test the material rather than reading a sequence of polished summary paragraphs.
The quality bar is not whether audio was generated. It is whether the conversation has enough rhythm, challenge and clarity to be worth 20–45 minutes of attention.
Choose a demonstration episode below. The examples and source names are synthetic. The page uses no private data, makes no model calls and does not connect to the private Podcast database.
The full workspace contains the persistent PDF library, real generated episodes, audio, usage data and paid generation controls. Its URL can be known, but the application itself is protected by authentication before private content or APIs are available.
The public demonstration is deliberately separated from the working application so a visitor cannot expose source files, trigger generation, consume API credits or reach private episode data.